Wednesday, December 6, 2006

The left in Latin America and the year that was

In the days following Hugo Chavez’ reelection victory numerous news sources have analyzed politics in the region over the past year. Here is what some of them had to say:

* Time magazine believed that politics in the region have entered a phase different from the typical “oligarchic capitalism and populist socialism” of the past. Deemed the “third way” it describes a moderate approach that strengthens democratic institutions and where ideas are valued over strict adherences to ideology.

* However, Tyler Bridges and Pablo Bachelet would disagree with Time’s assessment since they believe that two sides of the political left have emerged over the past year: a staunchly-anti neoliberal and anti-Washington stance and a moderate, “market-friendly” left epitomized by Chile and Brazil. Though only 3 of this year’s 12 presidential elections in Latin America were won by conservative candidates, “Latin America has become much more plugged into the rest of the world” which is “not necessarily a negative step” according to an analyst from conservative think-tank the Heritage Foundation.

* Chavez-brand of leftist populism has not taken a stranglehold across Latin America, according to the Christian Science Monitor. “The region is in great flux, and there is enormous frustration with persistent poverty. But there is no great revolutionary fervor in Latin America,” according to a political analyst cited in the article.

* Foreign Policy’s blog wonders about how relations between Chavez and ailing Cuban leader Fidel Castro will influence a possible “Chavista” revolution across the region.

* “The Latin American left…cannot hope to address poverty, inequality, economic underperformance, or social exclusion without reforming the state” opined a commentator at the Guardian UK. In addition, “the international community must back away from the imposition of rigid policy recipes and give the region latitude to experiment” in order to help democracy will be allowed to flourish instead of authoritarianism.

So what do you think? Are these articles relatively accurate or are they missing the point? Will the left in Latin America achieve similar success next year? Don't be shy; give us your opinion!

Links- Time, Guardian UK, Foreign Policy Passport (blog), Christian Science Monitor, Miami Herald The Latin Americanist (blog)

Image- Radio Netherlands

Tags- , ,

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think Latin Americans have come to realize that "free markets" and "globalization" are not necessarily a good thing in that it may not work as intended in their countries. In a sense, they are still trying to get it right. Fascism and totalitarianism didn't work, Communism didn't work either, neo-liberalism didn't work. So now they are trying something new in a very independent and refreshing way.

The left - either the "extreme" or more "moderate" version of it - has a lot to look forward to. The U.S. is too involved in other things, e.g., Iraq, Iran, North Korea, to get too involved right now. So, short of "strongly urging" locals not to vote for the left, there's not much more the U.S. will do about it.

RuizSKBO said...

It is a positive shift towards the left. Years of neo-liberal economic policies have been proved flawed for Latin America. Washington is loosing ground fast in their own backyard and I personally like that a lot. Even Colombia (where people seem to be hypnotized by the right - wing/conservative policies of president Uribe) saw the greatest surge of left-wing representation in recent congress elections. By 2010 we might even see a left leader coming to power in Colombia, something unthinkable given the FARC paradigm that dominates the political culture there. Positive news in my opinion.

Captain USpace said...

..
absurd thought -
God of the Universe thinks
communism is SUPER

even though it never works
because we are not robots



absurd thought -
God of the Universe feels
communism is fair

fools can't or won't think it through
idiots just keep scheming
..

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.